Исследование влияния полимеров на трение в обычных и гибких НКТ при повышенных температурах

A. H. Ахмед Хосни Ахмед Камель

Аннотация


The drag reduction resulting from the addition of small amount of linear macromolecules has found various applications in many areas of the oil & gas industry; including well completion, workover, drilling operations, and hydraulic fracturing. Temperature is among the factors affecting the extent of drag reduction. Other factors include salinity, polymer type and concentration, molecular weight and distribution, solvent chemistry, pH, ionic strength, molecular conformation, flow geometry, and degree of mechanical shearing. Despite the widespread use of brine solutions as base fluids in fracturing the deep hot formations, the effects of temperature on the drag reduction characteristics of polymers have received the least attention. Most studies have considered the ambient temperature conditions. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to experimentally investigate the effect of temperature on the extent of drag reduction of polymers flowing in straight and coiled tubing. The most commonly used anionic polyacrylamides; Nalco ASP-820 is investigated. ASP-820 is a sulfonate containing a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA). The pre-determined optimum concentration of ASP-820 polymer of 0.07 % (vol.) is used. A small flow loop with straight and coiled tubing sections is employed. To investigate the effect of temperature, tests are conducted with fresh water at 22, 38 and 55°C. It is found that ASP-820 polymer is a quite effective drag reducer in circular pipes. Drag reduction in the range of 30-80% is noticed. Drag reduction is more significant in straight tubing than in coiled tubing. Temperature shows a drastic effect on the drag reduction characteristics and its effect differs from straight to coiled tubing. Correlations to predict drag reduction at elevated temperature are developed. These results are presented and discussed in detail.



Ключевые слова


coiled tubing;drag reduction;polymers;straight tubing;temperature;well completion;гибкие трубы (колтюбинг);заканчивание скважин;полимеры;прямые трубы;снижение трения;температура

Полный текст:

PDF

Литература


1. A.H. Ahmed Kamel and S.N. Shah. 2009. Experimental Investigation of the Drag Reduction Characteristics of Polymeric Fluids in Straight and Coiled Tubing. Paper presented at the 8th International Egyptian-Syrian Oil Conference, Syria, Oct. 6-8.

2. Berman, N.S. 1978. Drag reduction by polymers. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 10: 47-67.

3. Britt, L.K., Smith, M.B., Haddad, Z., Lawrence, P., Chipperfield, S., and Hellman, T. 2006. Water-fracs: We do need proppant after all. SPE Annual technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, TX, Sep. 24-27.

4. Choi, H. J., Kim, C.A., Vinay, S.J., and Jhon, M. S. 2000. Effect of degradation on polymer-induced turbulent drag reduction. Polymer Preprints, 41 (1): 301-303.

5. Clifford, P.J. and Sorbie, K.S. 1985. The effects of chemical degradation on polymer flooding. The International Symposium on Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry. Phoenix, Arizona, April 9-11.

6. Dey, N.C. and Laik, S. 1986. Effect of temperature on intrinsic viscosity of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamides. Journal of the Institution of Engineers, 66: 22-24.

7. Drew, T.B., Koo, E.C., and McAdams, W.H. 1932. The friction factor for clean round pipes. AIChE, 28: 56-72.

8. Hoyt, J.W. 1985. Drag reduction by polymers and surfactants. Polymer-Flow Interaction Workshop. La Jolla, CA, 95-115.

9. Liu, Y., Gadde, P.B., and Sharma, M.M. 2006. Proppant placement using reverse-hybrid fracs. SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, May 15-17.

10. Lumely, J. L.: 1973. Drag reduction in turbulent flow by polymer additives,” Journal of Polymer Science, 7: 263-290.

11. Lumley, J.L. 1969. Drag reduction by additives. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1: 367-384.

12. Mills, R.D. 2006. Slickwater technology helping Greene County enhance natural gas production. SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Canton, Ohio, Oct. 11-13.

13. Nesyn, G.V., Manzhai, V.N., and Shibayev, V.P. 1989. Influence of temperature and the nature of the solvent on the ability of polymers to lower the drag resistance of liquids. Polymer Science, 31 (7): 1546-1553.

14. Peyser, P. and Little, R.C. 1971. The drag reduction of dilute polymer solutions as a function of solvent power, viscosity and temperature. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 15:2623-2637.

15. Posey, D. and Strickland, B. 2005. The effect of using lightweight proppant in treatment of a low-permeability, dry gas reservoirs: a case study. SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Morgantown, W. V. Sep. 14-16.

16. Shaefer, M. 2005. Are slick-water fracturing applications effective in the Jsand formation? SPE Annual technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, TX, Oct. -12.

17. Shah, S.N., Kamel, A.H., and Zhou, Y. 2006. Drag reduction characteristics in straight and coiled tubing – An experimental study. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 53: 179-188.

18. Srinivasan, P.S., Nandapurkar S.S., and Holland, F.A., 1970. Friction factors for coils. Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs, 48: 156-161.

19. Toms, B.A. 1949. Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers. First Intl. Congress on Rheology, North Holland, Amsterdam. 135-145.

20. Virk, P.S. 1975. Drag reduction fundamentals. AIChEJ, 21(4): 625-656.


Ссылки

  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.


© 2021 УГНТУ.
Все права защищены.